Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you can Peoples Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot away from accessory in people mating. Report on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Record out of Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technology one to decreases societal wedding and you will mental well-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, timing, and time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Newest People Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research from intimacy, passions, and commitment: Testing the latest assumptions of your triangular concept away from love. Psychological Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling greatest throughout the carrying out even worse: Public comparisons within this personal relationships. Log out of Identification and Public Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition away from romantic rivalry. Diary out-of Personality and you will Social Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
Good. (2001)mitment and you will relationship repair systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to glamorous choice: Brand new developed therapy regarding relationships repair. Evolution and you will Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and you will accord within the disappointed and you gorgeousbrides.net Klik pГҐ dette link nu will nondistressed marital partners. Record of Consulting and you will Medical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Environmentally friendly, A great. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Dating formation online: What is the larger destination? Diary regarding Personal Products, 58(1), 9–31.
The key benefits of confident illusions: Idealization therefore the design out-of pleasure in the intimate relationship
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison aim when you look at the intimate matchmaking: A type of international improvement and you can specific verification. Inside the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents in the examination of few interaction (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-specialist thread through the lens of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Routine, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh personal monitoring program: Improved sensitivity to help you personal cues just like the an adaptive a reaction to personal different. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new public outcast: Ostracism, societal exemption, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). In the world and you may specific relational habits regarding the experience of social affairs. Diary out-of Personality and you will Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and guidance trying to in close matchmaking. Personality and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will specific connection representations in the adulthood: Could there be a love?. Log From Social And personal Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. During the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate dating: Repair and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection personally feeling one of partners since the a function of the new resemblance within their mutual feel. Identity And you may Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Results of salience away from extrinsic benefits to the preference and you will enjoying. Record regarding Identification and Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.
About the Author
